Posted by
Julian Gratton
August 15th, 2010

When marketing campaigns go wrong

by Julian Gratton

LED device used to promote Aqua Teen Hunger Force that resulted in a bomb scare in BostonSo imagine this. You’ve been tasked by a major TV Network to promote an animated series with a guerrilla marketing campaign. Your idea is a winner, and involves you sending some electronic devices (that resemble a character from the Aqua Teen Hunger Force) to several major cities so that some hired help can place them in places that have a high footfall.

Then you wake up on the morning of day one of your campaign to hear that a member of the public has spotted one of your devices and thought it weird enough to report it to the police. The police then call the bomb squad asking for help in identifying a device. They then shut down part of a major highway and the public transportation system while they disable what they think is a bomb with a smaller explosive filled with water.

It gets worse!

Boston Police then received another call identifying a similar device that was found under a couple of bridges. As a precaution, the police closed both bridges and the coast guard also closed the river. It wasn’t until about 3pm that day that the police were informed it was a publicity stunt. By this time the news had gone national thanks to the multitude of TV trucks and helicopters covering the incident.

The fallout of this was that Interference Inc. (the agency who created the campaign) and Turner Broadcasting Systems agreed to pay out $2 million in compensation. There were further repercussions that you can read about here… but despite all the fines and arrests made, Peter Shankman author of ‘Can We Do That?! Outrageous PR Stunts That Work – And Why We Need Them’, summed it beautifully when he said:

“They just got $50 million of PR for $750,000, and they did a great, great job.”

Just for feet and the disastrous Super Bowl advert

Back in 1999 the US shoe retailer Just For Feet hired Saatchi & Saatchi to create an advert that it ran in the commercial break of Super Bowl XXXIII. A 30 second spot at this time cost advertisers $1.6 million and before the advert ran, Just For Feet’s share price was $16.

In the advert, embedded below, a white Humvee full of white men tracks a Kenyan runner. The men offer the runner a cup of water spiked with a sedative; the runner collapses, and the men force a pair of Nike trainers onto his feet. The runner wakes up, notices that he now has sneakers on his feet, screams, and runs away, attempting to shake the shoes off. I kid you not… this is the idea that ran, take a look below.

It is predicted that the advert was seen by 175 million people in the US and the next day was described as “Appallingly insensitive,” by The New York Times and “neo-colonialist … culturally imperialist, and probably racist” by the trade magazine Advertising Age. The Des Moine Register even said the company should be renamed “Just for Racists”.

As a result of the advert Just For Feet’s sales tumbled and their share price fell to $6 prompting Just For Feet to launch a $10 million lawsuit against Saatchi & Saatchi. Their case was based on the fact that Harold Ruttenberg, Just for Feet’s chief executive, claimed that Saatchi & Saatchi creatives browbeat him into using the advert despite his declared misgivings: “What we wanted was a fun sort of advertisement,” he said.

Just For Feet eventually dropped the lawsuit and in November 1999, Just For Feet filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection… luckily for Saatchi & Saatchi’s reputation it was not down to their advert… but accountancy fraud.

The fallout from the Just For Feet advert, however, prompted Chuck McBride (Creative Director of Wieden, Kennedy) to say: “It’s hard to come up with something truly great unless it walks that precarious line of, `Oh no, is it really horrible?’ I would feel gun-shy if I knew that every time I did something really horrible, I’d end up in court.”

We all make mistakes

I’m sure if you work in marketing or advertising you have your own stories of things going wrong. I know I do! What I’m trying to do by highlighting the two campaigns above is to make you feel better about any mistake that may happen… because even with the best intentions sometimes things are just out of your control.

Just ask anyone at Ogilvy & Mather who worked on the high profile $200 million ‘Beyond Petroleum’ public relations campaign for BP. How were they supposed to know that, not long after launching the campaign, a refinery was going to blow up in Texas. And that figures would reveal that BP was investing billions in buying other oil companies but only millions in researching and developing alternative fuels.

A still from the television advert for Strand cigarettes that is regarded as the most disastrous advert for cigarettes ever createdOr the good people who created an advertising campaign for Strand cigarettes with the strapline ‘You’re never alone with a Strand’. The omens for the advert were good. It was written by John May, was popular with the public, with Terrence Brooks (the smoking man) becoming a star and the music reaching Number 39 in the singles chart. However, sales of the brand were poor and it was soon taken off the market. The public associated smoking Strand cigarettes with being lonely and was put off from buying them. The advert is now regarded as the most disastrous cigarette advert ever aired.

So when your next print job goes wrong or you miss a spelling mistake. Or maybe you don’t get a great response rate, just remember the campaigns above. In fact just remember the BP case study and say to yourself this well-known phrase:

Worse things happen at sea!

If you’d like to have an effective marketing campaign created for you… why not give Red C a call on 0161 872 1361 or click here

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/marcbd Marc Davis

    The cartoon that was being touted a guerrilla marketing campaign was not “a children’s animated series”. It was on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim time slot. But your point remains — it went very wrong.

    The date of BP's “Beyond Petroleum” is years earlier than the oil rig explosion. It started to flop and peter out because of two events: the oil refinery explosion in Texas City, and the public recognition that despite all their hoopla, only 4% of BP's R&D budget was on green technologies. Tony Heyward, early in his brief tenure, made the call to have the advertising campaign pulled.

  • redc

    Hi Marc, thanks for pointing out those errors for me. I'll tweak the article.

  • http://bmarketeer.blogspot.com Hans De Keulenaer

    Marketing campaigns inevitably go wrong sometimes. But some mistakes are avoidable. To reduce the chance of failure, or at least have a story available when campaigns do go wrong, here's a checklist of a few questions to ask yourself, your customers or your colleagues before start:
    http://bmarketeer.blogspot.com/2010/08/checklis…

  • redc

    Great link Hans, thankyou

  • ILoveLondon

    Julian, these are what I would call honest mistakes. Nobody could have foreseen how some people would react to a marketing prop and how that reaction would go a long way to defeat YOUR purpose as a marketer. As you have said, these kinds of things happen to the best of us, just shrug it off and learn from it.

  • Lauded

    I actually think that this is not unavoidable. If you have a better feel of how the world outside your ad agency revolves and what is happening out there, you would certainly know where people's sensibilities would lie. In the case for Just for Feet, making fun of other people is just wrong, every one should have the sense to see that.

  • AdMan

    There are a lot more stupid mistakes when it comes to campaigns. I would leave out our agency's name and the client, but we recently ran a QR code campaign wherein a clothing brand was to have an instore QR code. The team assigned to it, generated a QR code and everything went well. The QR code campaign was launched, QR codes were deployed in every store. A local radio ad was run as well as an online site to announce the campaign. The only thing was that, when you can the QR code, it took you to a porn site.

  • Anita

    All I could say to that is OUCH. But I agree with you guys that this happens to the best of us. It's how you learn from these mistakes that matters!

blog comments powered by Disqus